I’m becoming increasingly convinced that the jarring rise of the far right is a massive, painful mirror held up for us to look hard at a progressive ideology that went too far.
We shouldn’t discard the core ideals of progressivism, rather we need to recognize how we drifted into our narcissism. If we have any hope of evolving out of this political morass, we’re going to have to stop pointing fingers and start doing the deep, messy work of healing and integrating our shadow.
The Spiritual Mandate of Integration
This analysis rests on the Jungian concepts of the collective shadow and the spiritual mandate for integration. It lies in the central exhortation of Jesus: love your enemy.
If I am going to genuinely love my enemy and expect them to reciprocate, I have to be certain first that I am lovable. When I look at the progressive movement through this lens of self-reflection, I see a profound failure to be lovable.
What follows are the realizations I came to after analyzing my own thoughts and beliefs which were based on internalized virtues and shadows of the progressive worldview for which I am now repenting. These thoughts are not unique or original but rather gathered over a time of meditation and prayer.
The Shadow
I present these realizations for reflection as the progressive movement’s un-examined flaws that created the vacuum the far right masterfully exploited:
- Progressive narcissism is the failure of collective self-reflection. This led to a corrosive identity purity culture.
- The movement used its rightful moral claims, like justice and equity, as a shield against criticism and as a self-righteous weapon against dissent. The moral claims were correct; the tactics deployed without empathy or a true commitment to universal inclusion.
- By defining itself so absolutely as “the good guys,” the movement refused to acknowledge its own capacity for judgment, arrogance, elitism, and exclusion.
- These flaws necessitated the creation of an out-group. The progressives became exceptionally proficient at finding fault in others and even some of its own, while actively avoiding its own culpability in becoming dogmatic and exclusionary.
- The resulting narcissistic posture is the inability to hear criticism without interpreting it as a direct, existential attack on the core virtues of the movement. This posture effectively stifled dialogue and created a chilling effect on internal dissent.
Generational pain stemming from real, justifiable, and systemic injustice is profound and must be acknowledged. However, that pain has not yet been fully processed, healed, and integrated into a mature, resilient identity.
- Instead of using justified moral rage as a catalyst for unifying, inclusive action, it was often used as an existential accusation. This stance, born from unhealed wounds, created immense and unsustainable moral pressure on those outside the circle of purity.
- People are profoundly unlikely to change when they are existentially accused and judged. The progressive movement pushed non-aligned populations away, creating the moral and psychological vacuum that the extreme right exploited.
The hard swing to the right, and the chaos it represents, isn’t just bad luck. It is painful, undeniable feedback to our shadow.
And so, my “repentance” is part of the collective act of honestly acknowledging this shadow, healing the justifiable pain, and prioritizing connection through meaningful, reciprocal relationships, not relationships mediated by algorithms nor moral purity tests.
By integrating my shadow, by becoming humble, and truly inclusive, I can break this toxic cycle and potentially contribute toward healing.
Perhaps then, as I attempt to love my enemy, will I be seen not as an other demanding compliance, but as a fellow traveler, lovable enough for relationships beyond ideology.